Nearly a decade after police officers marched world soccer officials out of a luxury hotel in Zurich at dawn, revealing a corruption scandal that shook the world’s most popular sport, the case is at risk of falling apart.
The dramatic turnabout comes over questions of whether American prosecutors overreached by applying U.S. law to a group of people, many of them foreign nationals, who defrauded foreign organizations as they carried out bribery schemes across the world.
The U.S. Supreme Court last year limited a law that was key to the case. Then in September, a federal judge, citing that, threw out the convictions of two defendants linked to soccer corruption. Now, several former soccer officials, including some who paid millions of dollars in penalties and served time in prison, are arguing that the bribery schemes for which they were convicted are no longer considered a crime in the United States.
The decision affirms that possession of suspected stolen property alone is insufficient for a conviction…
The Disputes Convocation promises to be a high-level, one-day conference carefully curated to equip participants…
Injunctions are purposed to protect a right where that legal right could be asserted either…
In our society, judges have discretionary power to do justice in a manner so wide…
In addition to this book being an educational resource for consumer rights protection, it is…
The Plaintiff, Akosua Serwaah Fosuh, claimed to be the only lawful surviving spouse of the late…