Tue, August 4, 2026
Feedback
233Legal
  • Latest
  • About Us
  • News
    • News Recap
  • Lifestyle
  • Profiles
  • Legal Resources
  • The Legal Mind
  • Monday Essay
  • Our Courts
    • Jurisdiction
    • Superior Courts
    • Lower Courts
  • Case of the Week
  • Videos
Reading: FIFA Convictions Are Imperiled by Questions of U.S. Overreach
Share
Font ResizerAa
233Legal233Legal
Search
  • Latest
  • About Us
  • News
    • News Recap
  • Lifestyle
  • Profiles
  • Legal Resources
  • The Legal Mind
  • Monday Essay
  • Our Courts
    • Jurisdiction
    • Superior Courts
    • Lower Courts
  • Case of the Week
  • Videos
Have an existing account? Sign In
©2024 Raven Gruppe. All Rights Reserved. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used except with the prior written permission of Raven Gruppe.
233Legal > International > FIFA Convictions Are Imperiled by Questions of U.S. Overreach

FIFA Convictions Are Imperiled by Questions of U.S. Overreach

Two Supreme Court decisions and a lower court’s ruling have cast doubt on the legal basis for a host of prosecutions. Several defendants want their records cleared and their money back.

May 19, 2025
SHARE
  • By International Desk

Nearly a decade after police officers marched world soccer officials out of a luxury hotel in Zurich at dawn, revealing a corruption scandal that shook the world’s most popular sport, the case is at risk of falling apart.

The dramatic turnabout comes over questions of whether American prosecutors overreached by applying U.S. law to a group of people, many of them foreign nationals, who defrauded foreign organizations as they carried out bribery schemes across the world.

The U.S. Supreme Court last year limited a law that was key to the case. Then in September, a federal judge, citing that, threw out the convictions of two defendants linked to soccer corruption. Now, several former soccer officials, including some who paid millions of dollars in penalties and served time in prison, are arguing that the bribery schemes for which they were convicted are no longer considered a crime in the United States.

READ MORE>>

Share this:

  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
Subscribe to Our Newsletter
Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

What do you think?
Love0
Sad0
Happy0
Angry0
Dead0
Wink0
Surprise0
Previous Article British Court Answers an Eternal Question: How Much Potato Does a Crisp Contain?
Next Article Who is Justice Richard Adjei-Frimpong?

Sign up for our newsletter

Get the latest articles sent to your inbox

Recommended for you

Is It Bad to Eat Late at Night?

It’s linked to heartburn, disrupted sleep, metabolic issues and more. Research suggests that, if possible, it’s best to avoid eating…

1 Min Read

Theodore B. Olson, Conservative Lawyer Who Took Up Liberal Causes, Dies at 84

Theodore B. Olson, a leading Supreme Court litigator who built a sturdy reputation as a conservative power lawyer during the…

1 Min Read

On Nantucket, a Legal Maneuver to Protect Historic Homes From Gutting

A steady erosion of history has been underway on the island for years, with ultrawealthy newcomers remaking the interiors of…

2 Min Read

British Court Answers an Eternal Question: How Much Potato Does a Crisp Contain?

A snack company’s yearslong effort to protect the sanctity of its poppadom spuddered — er, sputtered — in a tax…

1 Min Read
233Legal
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Events
  • Profiles
  • Book Recommendation
  • Legal Resources
  • International
  • The Legal Mind
  • News Recap
  • Lifestyle
  • Opinion

©2024 Raven Gruppe. All Rights Reserved. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used except with the prior written permission of Raven Gruppe.

Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?