A snack company’s yearslong effort to protect the sanctity of its poppadom spuddered — er, sputtered — in a tax tribunal this month.
No profit grows, Shakespeare once wrote, where no pleasure is taken. And so in the tedious march of life, we find joy in small things: The rising of the sun. A fine glass of wine. The greasy snap of a well-dressed potato crisp.
But soft! Not so fast. Life affords no simple pleasures, and even that delectable crunch comes with a weighty debate: How much potato doth a true crisp — chip, to the Americans — contain?
This — and several other probing questions of the crisp aficionado — was immortalized by a British tax appeals court last week, which ruled that Walkers Sensations Poppadoms, the fluffy, non-crisp-appearing potato medallions, are, in fact, the same as potato crisps.
By parity of reasoning, there can be no stay of execution of a judgment which…
This occasion marks not merely the passage of time, but a significant milestone in the…
A three-member panel of the court of appeal unanimously allowed Sedinam Tamakloe's appeal, quashed her…
This case, decided by the Supreme Court of Ghana, answered both questions- and delivered a…
Judgments are not mere decisions, they are lessons and also, they become the precedent upon…
Can the holder of a mining lease lawfully permit another person to undertake mining activities…