News

US Supreme Court Upholds Law Banning TikTok in the United States

For TikTok creators, the decision to ban the popular social media app has profound implications.

The U.S. Supreme Court has unanimously upheld a law that could result in the ban of TikTok across the country, sparking concern among its millions of users. For many, TikTok is more than a social media platform—it is a vital source of income and creative expression.

The legislation stems from lawmakers’ concerns over TikTok’s links to China, which they argue pose significant national security risks. In response, TikTok contested the law in court, asserting that banning the app would infringe upon free speech rights for its reported 170 million U.S. users. Despite these arguments, the Supreme Court’s ruling requires TikTok to secure an approved U.S.-based buyer or face removal from app stores and web hosting platforms.

For TikTok creators, the decision has profound implications. One user likened the ruling to “going to work and your office building’s just vanished,” underscoring the uncertainty faced by those who rely on the app for their livelihood.

The ban is legally set to begin Sunday- 19 January,  2025, though its enforcement may hinge on political transitions. The Biden administration has deferred the matter to incoming President Donald Trump, who assumes office Monday. Trump, a vocal critic of TikTok since 2020, has expressed interest in preserving the platform’s U.S. operations under certain conditions, leaving its future uncertain.

This ruling highlights the complex intersection of national security, technology regulation, and free speech—an issue likely to remain in the spotlight as the U.S. navigates its evolving relationship with global technology platforms.

Confidence Mawusi-a passionate technology enthusiast and a third-year LLB student at UPSA Law School-contributed to this article.

By International Desk

Recent Posts

4th Kojo Bentsi-Enchill Memorial Lecture: Honouring a legacy, Strengthening Africa’s legal future

On 4th September 2025, Bentsi-Enchill, Letsa & Ankomah (BELA) hosted the  4th Kojo Bentsi-Enchill Memorial Lecture,…

24 hours ago

Case of the Week: Gyan Alias Amoah and another v. Dabrah

The plaintiff-respondent, Mr. Dabrah, initiated an action in the District Court Grade II, Assin Manso,…

1 day ago

President Removes Chief Justice Torkornoo Under Article 146

President John Dramani Mahama has, in strict accordance with Article 146(9) of the 1992 Constitution,…

1 week ago

Case of the Week: Nana Kwadwo v. Inspector-General of Police & Attorney General

In September 2015, Nana Kwadwo (Plaintiff), a businessman, purchased a Range Rover SUV from Patrick…

2 weeks ago

Beyond the Founder: Lessons on Building Enduring Law Firms

Central to her address was the role of People and Culture, stressing that the ability…

2 weeks ago

Getaways for Lawyers this vacation

Our style desk engaged a few well-travelled members of the Bar for their preferred vacation…

2 weeks ago