International

The Texas Billionaire Who Has Greenpeace USA on the Verge of Bankruptcy

Fossil-fuel billionaire Kelcy Warren is about to land a knockout punch on Greenpeace. 

The pipeline magnate’s company, Energy Transfer, is behind a lawsuit that Greenpeace says could bankrupt the environmental group’s U.S. affiliate. A courtroom victory, which some Greenpeace officials fear is likely, would be a coda in the nearly decadelong battle between the two sides over one of Warren’s signature projects: the Dakota Access Pipeline.

In 2016, Greenpeace, Native American tribal groups and thousands of other activists camped in a remote corner of North Dakota to block the project. The monthslong protests impeded the oil pipeline’s completion and became a flashpoint in the fight over fossil fuels. Images of sometimes violent confrontations between protesters and law enforcement made international news.

Warren ultimately completed the conduit, but the fight wasn’t over for him.

Warren sees green activists, who he once said should be “removed from the gene pool,” as a serious threat to the industry. Starting with protests of Keystone XL, which successfully derailed that project, activists have targeted pipelines across the country. 

“Everybody is afraid of these environmental groups and the fear that it may look wrong if you fight back with these people,” Warren said in a 2017 TV interview. “But what they did to us is wrong, and they’re gonna pay for it.”Now the pugnacious tycoon, who is valued at more than $7 billion, is within spitting distance of dealing a serious blow to Greenpeace—and the U.S. green movement. 

Energy Transfer’s lawsuit alleges several Greenpeace entities incited the Dakota Access protests, funded attacks to damage the pipeline, and spread misinformation about the company and its project. The case is set for trial in February in a North Dakota state court, where both sides expect a fossil-fuel-friendly jury. Energy Transfer is seeking $300 million in damages, which would likely wipe out Greenpeace USA, according to the group’s leadership. 

Read More>>

By International Desk

Share
Published by
By International Desk

Recent Posts

Ghana’s Brics Bid and the Price of Strategic Autonomy

As Washington takes a more disruptive, transactional, and uncharacteristically unconventional approach to global cooperation, and…

3 days ago

Monday Essay: When the Shell Remains: The Vanishing Trial Record and the Struggle to Reconcile Fair Trial Rights and Judicial Integrity

During moments when staff of the judicial service embark on strike action to demand their…

4 days ago

Read the Full Ruling in the Case of The Republic v The High Court, Tema

On Tuesday, 24th March, 2026, the Supreme delivered its ruling in the case of The…

1 week ago

Case of the Week: Obaapanin Abena Manu & Forty-three others v. Opanin Kwaku Mensah & Four Others

The dispute concerned House No. ME 32, Block 12, Manhyia Extension, Kumasi. The house had…

1 week ago

Monday Essay: Beyond Legalism: The Influence of Judicial Ideology, Personal Values and Other Factors on Judicial Decisions

There is no doubt that judicial ideology constitutes a fundamental aspect that shapes legal interpretations…

2 weeks ago

Writ of Summons: Zakaria Abdulai v Manasseh Azure Awuni & Multimedia Group

On Friday, 16th October, 2026, Zakaria Abdulai instituted a defamation action against investigative journalist Manasseh…

2 weeks ago