International

The Texas Billionaire Who Has Greenpeace USA on the Verge of Bankruptcy

Fossil-fuel billionaire Kelcy Warren is about to land a knockout punch on Greenpeace. 

The pipeline magnate’s company, Energy Transfer, is behind a lawsuit that Greenpeace says could bankrupt the environmental group’s U.S. affiliate. A courtroom victory, which some Greenpeace officials fear is likely, would be a coda in the nearly decadelong battle between the two sides over one of Warren’s signature projects: the Dakota Access Pipeline.

In 2016, Greenpeace, Native American tribal groups and thousands of other activists camped in a remote corner of North Dakota to block the project. The monthslong protests impeded the oil pipeline’s completion and became a flashpoint in the fight over fossil fuels. Images of sometimes violent confrontations between protesters and law enforcement made international news.

Warren ultimately completed the conduit, but the fight wasn’t over for him.

Warren sees green activists, who he once said should be “removed from the gene pool,” as a serious threat to the industry. Starting with protests of Keystone XL, which successfully derailed that project, activists have targeted pipelines across the country. 

“Everybody is afraid of these environmental groups and the fear that it may look wrong if you fight back with these people,” Warren said in a 2017 TV interview. “But what they did to us is wrong, and they’re gonna pay for it.”Now the pugnacious tycoon, who is valued at more than $7 billion, is within spitting distance of dealing a serious blow to Greenpeace—and the U.S. green movement. 

Energy Transfer’s lawsuit alleges several Greenpeace entities incited the Dakota Access protests, funded attacks to damage the pipeline, and spread misinformation about the company and its project. The case is set for trial in February in a North Dakota state court, where both sides expect a fossil-fuel-friendly jury. Energy Transfer is seeking $300 million in damages, which would likely wipe out Greenpeace USA, according to the group’s leadership. 

Read More>>

By International Desk

Share
Published by
By International Desk

Recent Posts

Case of the Week: Rahim Ibrahim & 3 others v. The Public

The decision affirms that possession of suspected stolen property alone is insufficient for a conviction…

2 days ago

Disputes Convocation Steering Committee Pays Courtesy Call on Nana Dr. S. K. B. Asante

The Disputes Convocation promises to be a high-level, one-day conference carefully curated to equip participants…

6 days ago

MONDAY ESSAY: The Corpse In Court: Examining Judicial Attitudes To Restraining Orders Over Dead Bodies

Injunctions are purposed to protect a right where that legal right could be asserted either…

6 days ago

MONDAY ESSAY: The Public Interest, Judicial Independence & The Myth Of Neutrality

In our society, judges have discretionary power to do justice in a manner so wide…

2 weeks ago

Read the full Speech by Dr Francisca Kusi-Appiah at the Launch of a Landmark Publication on Consumer Rights and Justice in Ghana

In addition to this book being an educational resource for consumer rights protection, it is…

2 weeks ago

Case of week: Akosua Serwaah Fosuh v. Abusuapanin Kofi Owusu & 2 Others

The Plaintiff, Akosua Serwaah Fosuh, claimed to be the only lawful surviving spouse of the late…

2 weeks ago