/

Read the full text of Mark Darlington Osae v The Food and Drugs Authority and Attorney-General

Twenty one photography for 233legal

On 19th June 2024 the Supreme Court by a 5-2 majority decision dismissed a suit filed by Mark Darlington Osae against the Food and Drugs Authority’s (FDA) challenging the latter’s directives that banned celebrities from advertisements of alcholic beverages. 

The decision, delivered by Justice Asiedu reasoned that the said directive was “not excessive and unreasonable.”

The facts:

The Food and Drugs Authority, (FDA) issued a directive that placed a ban on celebrities from advertising alcoholic beverages.

The FDA’s directives rooted in public policy were aimed at protecting minors from being influenced by celebrities into patronising alcholic beverages.

Guideline 3.2.10 of “Guidelines for the Advertisement of Foods” -published by the FDA on February 1, 2016- states inter alia that “No well-known personality or professional shall be used in alcoholic beverage advertising”.

Mark Osae, the manager of Reggie ‘N’ Bollie and Skrewfaze dissatisfied with the directive issued a writ at the Supreme Court on November 11, 2022, saying the FDA’s 2015 regulations were discriminatory against the creative arts industry.

Mark Darlington Osae, prayed the Supreme Court to take down that regulation, praying that the directive that “no well-known personality or professional shall be used in alcoholic beverage advertising,” is inconsistent with and in contravention of articles 17(1) and 17 (2) of the 1992 Constitution.

He also contended that Articles 17(1) and 17 (2) of the 1992 Constitution guarantees equality before the law and prohibit discrimination against persons on grounds of social or economic status, occupation, among others, and consequently null, void, and unenforceable.

The panel of seven Justices of the Supreme Court presided over by Chief Justice Gertrude Sackey Torkornoo essentially ruled that the directive does not contravene provisions in the Constitution.

Read the full judgement here

By Legal Desk

Recent Posts

Monday Essay:Act 1170 Unbound: Dismantling the Gate, Building the Bridge to the Bar

For decades, the road to Ghana’s Bar was guarded by a single gate at which…

6 days ago

Grooming Justice: The Bench, The bar and The Burden of Guidance

Contemporary concerns about inadequate lawyer mentoring in Ghana is not new, but reflects a long-standing…

1 week ago

Full statement of Case: Prof. Frimpong Boateng & 2Ors v. NPP & 4Ors

On 26th January, 2026, Prof. Frimpong Boateng & two others distinguished senior citizens caused a…

1 week ago

Case of the Week: Laverne Carranza Naa Okailey Shooter v. Intercom Programming & Manufacturing co. Ltd

This case concerned the unauthorised use of the image of a former Miss Ghana winner…

1 week ago

MONDAY ESSAY: Scandalizing Justice: Free Expression at the Bar of Contempt

When speech turns from critique to contempt, the law steps in – not to silence…

3 weeks ago

The Founder Who Lost His Company Without Selling a Share

The lesson is as simple as it is exacting. A founder does not lose his…

3 weeks ago