A lawsuit Exxon Mobil brought to stop an investor from making climate-related proposals was dismissed, closing what some had seen as a potential legal avenue for companies to take on shareholder activism.
After investment firm Arjuna Capital promised to never again hit Exxon with a greenhouse gas-related resolution, the court couldn’t weigh in further, U.S. District Judge Mark Pittman said in a decision released after a hearing Monday in Fort Worth, Texas. Courts can’t weigh in on a legal question without a live controversy in play, Pittman said, dismissing the case as moot.
Pittman’s decision ends the lawsuit, brought by Exxon in January, without a ruling on the law on shareholder proposals, which in recent years have steadily risen in number. Many come from investors with small stakes who want to push companies on hot-button cultural and environmental issues.
In Ghana’s Fourth Republic, justice increasingly competes with time. Courtrooms from Accra to Tamale groan…
This case interrogates the boundaries between resignation and constructive dismissal, and clarifies the evidential burden…
Modern justice delivery has quietly displaced a major part of the action in the witness…
Beyond capital thresholds, the new Act strengthens local participation requirements, including a 75% local skilled…
But the fact that we argue through writs, not coups, is the Court’s victory.From Chalmers…
Once a court has completed a case, it washes its hands and moves forward without…