A lawsuit Exxon Mobil brought to stop an investor from making climate-related proposals was dismissed, closing what some had seen as a potential legal avenue for companies to take on shareholder activism.
After investment firm Arjuna Capital promised to never again hit Exxon with a greenhouse gas-related resolution, the court couldn’t weigh in further, U.S. District Judge Mark Pittman said in a decision released after a hearing Monday in Fort Worth, Texas. Courts can’t weigh in on a legal question without a live controversy in play, Pittman said, dismissing the case as moot.
Pittman’s decision ends the lawsuit, brought by Exxon in January, without a ruling on the law on shareholder proposals, which in recent years have steadily risen in number. Many come from investors with small stakes who want to push companies on hot-button cultural and environmental issues.
The decision affirms that possession of suspected stolen property alone is insufficient for a conviction…
The Disputes Convocation promises to be a high-level, one-day conference carefully curated to equip participants…
Injunctions are purposed to protect a right where that legal right could be asserted either…
In our society, judges have discretionary power to do justice in a manner so wide…
In addition to this book being an educational resource for consumer rights protection, it is…
The Plaintiff, Akosua Serwaah Fosuh, claimed to be the only lawful surviving spouse of the late…