Tue, August 4, 2026
Feedback
233Legal
  • Latest
  • About Us
  • News
    • News Recap
  • Lifestyle
  • Profiles
  • Legal Resources
  • The Legal Mind
  • Monday Essay
  • Our Courts
    • Jurisdiction
    • Superior Courts
    • Lower Courts
  • Case of the Week
  • Videos
Reading: Can the Supreme Court Save Itself and Its Future?
Share
Font ResizerAa
233Legal233Legal
Search
  • Latest
  • About Us
  • News
    • News Recap
  • Lifestyle
  • Profiles
  • Legal Resources
  • The Legal Mind
  • Monday Essay
  • Our Courts
    • Jurisdiction
    • Superior Courts
    • Lower Courts
  • Case of the Week
  • Videos
Have an existing account? Sign In
©2024 Raven Gruppe. All Rights Reserved. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used except with the prior written permission of Raven Gruppe.
233Legal > News > Can the Supreme Court Save Itself and Its Future?

Can the Supreme Court Save Itself and Its Future?

July 24, 2025
SHARE
via Edwin Anankpieg
  • By Legal Desk

May 22, 2025

In an extraordinary development unprecedented in Ghana’s constitutional history, the suspended Chief Justice, Her Ladyship Justice Gertrude Araba Esaaba Sackey Torkornoo, has instituted a suit before the Supreme Court invoking its original jurisdiction. By writ filed on the 21st May 2025, she is seeking multiple reliefs, including declarations on the scope of her rights to fair and public hearing, the constitutionality of the President’s actions, and the qualifications of certain committee members.

The suit raises complex and critical questions of constitutional interpretation as to whether:

  1. a Chief Justice can waive her right to an in camera hearing under Article 146(8)
  2. the determination of a prima facie case must necessarily be accompanied by a reasoned, quasi-judicial decision.
  3. There are any safeguards to ensure that proceedings under Article 146 are not used to undermine the independence of the judiciary.

These questions, and the broader implications of the suit, lie at the heart of a legal and constitutional moment that may well redefine the contours of judicial independence, executive authority, and procedural fairness under the 1992 Constitution.

Stay tuned as the Supreme Court prepares to pronounce on these matters which will invariably impact them now and in the future.

Subscribe to Our Newsletter
Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

What do you think?
Love0
Sad0
Happy0
Angry0
Dead0
Wink0
Surprise0
Previous Article Case of the week: Nyameneba and Others v The State.
Next Article Read the full ruling in Vincent Ekow Assafuah v Attorney-General

Sign up for our newsletter

Get the latest articles sent to your inbox

Recommended for you

Here is what to know about the arrest of Mr. Kwabena Adu-Boahene and Madam Angela Adjei Boateng so far:

it should equally be stated that inasmuch as an accused person has the right to declare and insist on his…

8 Min Read

Legal Challenge Filed Against Chief Justice’s Removal Process in Ghana

Vincent Ekow Assafuah, a citizen of Ghana and the Member of Parliament for Old Tafo, has today filed a Writ…

1 Min Read

Full statement of Case: Prof. Frimpong Boateng & 2Ors v. NPP & 4Ors

On 26th January, 2026, Prof. Frimpong Boateng & two others distinguished senior citizens caused a Writ to issue in the…

1 Min Read

Read the full ruling in Vincent Ekow Assafuah v Attorney-General

A 3:2 majority decision delivered by the Supreme Court, with Justices Henrietta Mensa-Bonsu and Ernest Gaewu dissenting,

1 Min Read
233Legal
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Events
  • Profiles
  • Book Recommendation
  • Legal Resources
  • International
  • The Legal Mind
  • News Recap
  • Lifestyle
  • Opinion

©2024 Raven Gruppe. All Rights Reserved. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used except with the prior written permission of Raven Gruppe.

Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?